From <IMAP4.psuedo.sims> Thu Apr  7 09:43:30 2005
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:43:30 -0600 (MDT)
From: Postmaster
Subject: Message from mail server       
Content-Length: 96
Mime-Version: 1.0
Status: RO
X-IMAP: 1112888610 1

Delete.
This is a system message.                                















--END+PSEUDO--

From wbwang@ucar.edu  Thu Sep  2 17:09:01 2004
Received: from tritonNew.ucar.edu (dhcp4121 [128.117.104.121])
	by jabba.hao.ucar.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i82N90n04598
	for <foster@hao.ucar.edu>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:09:00 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20040902165333.01f6a9d8@pop.hao.ucar.edu>
X-Sender: wbwang@pop.hao.ucar.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:09:12 -0600
To: Ben Foster <foster@hao.ucar.edu>
From: Wenbin Wang <wbwang@ucar.edu>
Subject: Periodic points in dt.F
In-Reply-To: <200011141555.IAA12403@vishnu.hao.ucar.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Keywords:                 
Status: RO
X-Status: $$$$
X-UID: 0000000001


>Hi, Ben

in dt.F in versions of tiegcm I see that subroutines that set periodic 
points for updated neutral temperature are commented out. I belive that we 
need values at those periodic points for updated temperatures in subroutine 
dldp in duv.F, when calculating second order derivatives of the potential 
height. Could you please double check this? I got inconsistent values for 
zl and zp at i=3,4 and i=73, 74. Or may be just a problem for the Linux 
version I have?

Thanks

Wenbin