From wdg@eos.haystack.edu Tue Sep 26 17:02 MDT 1995 Received: from cedar.hao.ucar.edu (cedar [128.117.16.90]) by vishnu.hao.ucar.edu (8.6.11/8.6.6.Beta9) with ESMTP id RAA17960 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 17:02:23 -0600 Received: from hyperion.haystack.edu (hyperion.haystack.edu [192.52.65.1]) by cedar.hao.ucar.edu (8.6.11/8.6.6.Beta9) with SMTP id RAA15905 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 17:02:22 -0600 Received: from eos.MITHAY (eos.haystack.edu) by hyperion.haystack.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA18651; Tue, 26 Sep 95 19:02:20 EDT Received: by eos.MITHAY (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05035; Tue, 26 Sep 95 19:00:40 EDT Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 19:00:40 EDT From: wdg@eos.haystack.edu (Wei Deng) Message-Id: <9509262300.AA05035@eos.MITHAY> To: foster@cedar.hao.ucar.edu Subject: Jan93 Campaign Content-Type: text Content-Length: 615 Status: RO Hi, Foster I got some contour plots of TIME-GCM simulations for Jan. 20-30, 1993 campaign from you. I'd like to compare the amplitude and phase of semidiurnal and diurnal componets of neutral winds with the radar data at 85, 90 and 95 km. I found some countour plots labeled as VN AMPLITUDE (1), VN AMPLITUDE(2) and VN AMPLITUDE(3) from the plots you gave to me on this January. I guess that AMPLITUDE(1) means the amplitude of diurnal componet of northward wind, AMPLITUDE(2) means the amplitude of semidiurnal componet and so on. Could you tell me if this is correct? Thanks Wei Deng MIT Haystack Observatory