From roble@ouray.hao.ucar.edu Thu Jun 22 10:23 MDT 1995 Received: from ouray.hao.ucar.edu (ouray [128.117.16.17]) by vishnu.hao.ucar.edu (8.6.11/8.6.6.Beta9) with ESMTP id KAA01080 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 1995 10:23:40 -0600 Received: (from roble@localhost) by ouray.hao.ucar.edu (8.6.11/8.6.6.Beta9) id KAA20416 for foster; Thu, 22 Jun 1995 10:23:38 -0600 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 10:23:38 -0600 From: Ray Roble Message-Id: <199506221623.KAA20416@ouray.hao.ucar.edu> To: foster@ouray.hao.ucar.edu Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1832 Status: RO Ben - here is the message I got from Gonzalo. --Ray From HERNANDEZ@MAX.U.WASHINGTON.EDU Mon Jun 19 22:36 MDT 1995 Received: from max1.u.washington.edu (max1.u.washington.edu [140.142.84.5]) by ouray.hao.ucar.edu (8.6.11/8.6.6.Beta9) with ESMTP id WAA18490 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 22:36:22 -0600 Received: from MAX.U.WASHINGTON.EDU.L by MAX.U.WASHINGTON.EDU.L (PMDF V4.3-10 #10868) id <01HRWKXYACXGEAF4K0@MAX.U.WASHINGTON.EDU.L>; Mon, 19 Jun 1995 21:38:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 21:38:30 -0800 (PST) From: HERNANDEZ@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: mail test Sender: HERNANDEZ@MAX.U.WASHINGTON.EDU To: roble@ouray.hao.ucar.edu Message-id: <01HRWKXYACXIEAF4K0@MAX.U.WASHINGTON.EDU.L> X-Envelope-to: roble@ouray.hao.ucar.edu X-VMS-To: IN%"roble@ouray.hao.ucar.edu" MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Length: 1100 Status: RO Ray: As you see by this reply, the test did work. I will call you tomorrw, and proceed from here. Since you are still reading, the figures we spoke about last time are the hourly plots for the `new' TIEGCM, of which you provided us with just a sample. We are interested in the ones that show the flow diagrams looking overhead of the Pole. The samples we have are a few from history=/roble.rgr94/tesp43 ( marked By- ) and history=/roble/rgr94/tesp33 ( marked By + ). There are also some emission rate ones ( history vol=/roble/rgr94/tesp41 ). As you may recall, we have data for August 1992 ( red line ) from Mawson, Halley and South Pole. Those date are supposed to be matched by the runs you made. In the last run you did NOT include the electron densities, seeing that the earlier run comparison was made with the available e-densities. That should set the stage for this study... Gonzalo