From meier@uap.nrl.navy.mil Fri Nov 15 15:30:36 1996 Received: from hao.ucar.edu (hao [128.117.16.4]) by vishnu.hao.ucar.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA12537 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:30:35 -0700 (MST) Received: from uap.nrl.navy.mil (uap.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.167.81]) by hao.ucar.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA10831; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 15:30:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from pcuap7.nrl.navy.mil by uap.nrl.navy.mil with SMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:30:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <2.2.32.19961115223119.0072d62c@uap.nrl.navy.mil> X-Sender: meier@uap.nrl.navy.mil X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 17:31:19 -0500 To: ROBLE@HAO.UCAR.EDU From: "Robert R. Meier" Subject: July 82 storm Cc: dougdrob@engin.umich.edu, foster@HAO.UCAR.EDU Status: R Content-Length: 819 Dear Ray, A few weeks ago, I sent you an email inquiring about rerunning your model for the July 82 storm, since the files had been deleted from our disk. In my absence (I was away for the past three weeks), the tapes sent by Ben Foster were located and reloaded onto the disk; they appear to be in good shape. Thus we can proceed with the analyses that I mentioned earlier. Would you still recommend rerunning one of the GCMs; ie, have the upgrades made enough difference that the older results are no longer valid? Doug Drob also was able to download DE2 files containing neutral density information, so we will have yet another check on the imaging and the GCM model fields. Hopefully, we will make significant progress in the near term and be able to show you some interesting conclusions. Best regards, Bob